Get in touch
Thank you for reaching out! Please tell us more about your needs — our expert team will get back to you within 24 hours.
Featured snippet: CAL TB 117-2013 is California’s mandatory technical standard for the smolder resistance of upholstered furniture, tested with a smoldering cigarette rather than an open flame. Although it is a California regulation, it has become the de facto US furniture fire safety standard. It does not require added flame retardants — physical barrier fabrics and inherently flame-retardant (IFR) fibers are the accepted compliance paths.
If you plan to sell upholstered furniture in the US market, understanding and complying with fire safety regulations is the first barrier to entry. This guide breaks down CAL TB 117-2013, the current reference standard for furniture fire safety in the United States, so you can avoid compliance risk and choose the right materials.

CAL TB 117-2013 (California Technical Bulletin 117-2013) is a mandatory technical standard established by the California Bureau of Household Goods and Services (BHGS). Its core purpose is to evaluate the smolder resistance of upholstered furniture when exposed to a smoldering heat source — a lit cigarette.
Although it is technically a California regulation, the size of the state’s economy and the unified nature of global supply chains have made it the de facto national standard for the entire US furniture industry.
Key facts:
Because CAL TB 117-2013 is the universal threshold for the North American market, almost all soft furnishing products intended for export must comply. Key application areas include:
This is the primary application for TB 117-2013. All upholstered furniture sold in the US retail market (such as IKEA, Ashley, Walmart, and Target) must be compliant.
For residential seating, sofa velvet upholstery and other IFR textiles are a common compliant choice.
Commercial spaces often have stricter fire codes (such as NFPA 260), but TB 117-2013 is frequently treated as the minimum entry standard.
CAL TB 117-2013 is a component test. The standard tests fabrics (Section 1), barriers (Section 2), filling materials (Section 3), and decking (Section 4) separately. For fabric suppliers, the critical focus is Section 1.
The test simulates a lit cigarette falling into the crevice of a sofa.
To receive a passing report, the specimen must meet all three conditions:
Expert correction: note that Section 3 (filling material test) of TB 117-2013 is also a smoldering cigarette test, not an open flame test. The idea that the new standard requires open flame or heat release testing for foam is incorrect.
To understand the significance of TB 117-2013, compare it with its predecessor (TB 117-2000). This shift represents a major industry move from “chemical fire suppression” to “physical fire safety.”
| Feature | TB 117-2000 (Old) | TB 117-2013 (Current) |
| Primary test object | Filling materials (foam) | Component test (fabric + foam + barrier) |
| Ignition source | Open flame | Smoldering cigarette |
| Chemical retardants | Mandatory (often PBDEs/TDCPP) | Not required (physical barriers encouraged) |
| Eco and health | High toxicity concerns | Non-toxic focus, aligns with global eco trends |
| Scope | Mandatory in California only | National standard (North American norm) |
In the global market, buyers often confuse the US standard (CAL TB 117-2013) with the European standard (EN 1021). Both use cigarettes as a heat source, but they serve different legal jurisdictions and function slightly differently. For a wider view, see our comparison of EU, US, and China flammability testing standards.
| Comparison | CAL TB 117-2013 (USA) | EN 1021 (Europe) |
| Ignition source | Smoldering cigarette only | Part 1: cigarette · Part 2: match (open flame) |
| Test substrate | Standard PU foam (non-FR), tests the fabric’s protective ability | Standard PU foam (fabric test) or CMHR foam (furniture test) |
| Difficulty | Moderate — fabric must block oxygen to the foam | Variable — Part 1 similar to TB 117; Part 2 (match) is harder |
| Interchangeability | Accepted in USA/Canada | Accepted in EU/UK (Part 1 only) |
Generally, no. Although the physics of the cigarette test are nearly identical, US retailers and compliance officers strictly require the report to cite “CAL TB 117-2013” specifically. Presenting an EN 1021 certificate will likely result in rejection by the buyer.
From a material development perspective, if a fabric passes CAL TB 117-2013, it has a very high probability (99%+) of also passing EN 1021-1 (cigarette), because the physical requirements are closely correlated.
Facing the US market’s strict “chemical-free” requirement, the furniture industry relies mainly on physical flame-retardancy mechanisms to pass the test. Below are the most common material solutions.
These fabrics use fiber characteristics or weave structure to stop cigarette heat from igniting the foam, without chemical additives.
For high-traffic areas such as hotels and offices that need durability and permanent fire safety, the industry typically uses the following technologies:
For contract seating that must also meet NFPA 260, an NFPA 260 compliant upholstery fabric is a direct, documented option.
Heavy-Duty Flame Retardant Upholstery Fabric for High-Traffic Commercial Seating
Inherent Flame Retardant Polyester Sofa Fabric for Commercial Projects Direct Factory
Begoodtex Flame Retardant Warp Knitted Fabric 100% Polyester
If you are a furniture manufacturer or exporter, use this checklist when sourcing fabrics:
CAL TB 117-2013 is more than a California rule — it is the practical entry ticket to the North American furniture market. The standard rewards physical fire safety over chemical additives, which aligns with both buyer demand and global eco trends.
When selecting materials, match the solution to the application:
For any project, always request a valid third-party test report and keep the “chemical-free” claim documented. Whether you need a single flame-retardant fabric or a full compliant program, the right material choice starts with the right standard.
Both focus on cigarette testing, but EN 1021 has two parts: Part 1 (cigarette) and Part 2 (match/flame). CAL TB 117-2013 involves only the cigarette smolder test. The test substrate (foam) also differs, so certificates are generally not directly interchangeable.
Yes. Almost all residential upholstered furniture sold in the US market is required by retailers to comply with this standard. Compliance is even stricter for juvenile products.
No. It is a smolder resistance test. The old version (TB 117-2000) included open flame testing, but the current version eliminated it to reduce the use of flame retardant chemicals.
Yes. We offer a full range of compliant fabrics, including chemical-free high-GSM polyester, jacquards, velvets, and high-performance IFR series, all backed by third-party lab reports.
It depends. While RV interiors are primarily governed by FMVSS 302 (automotive standard), many high-end RV manufacturers — or those selling loose furniture inside RVs — mandate TB 117-2013 compliance for higher safety.
CAL TB 117-2013 is the baseline cigarette-smolder component standard for residential upholstered furniture. NFPA 260 is a stricter, classification-based standard often required for commercial, hospitality, and public-space seating. Many contract projects must meet both.